I clearly remember having a CD (or DVD ?) with Port Royale that had copy protection and the disc cracked and I wrote the company that were on the label (British company at that time) and they sent me a Port Royale 2 disc as substitution because they thought that I ought to be happy with that, and I wrote back and politely declined and asked for a copy of the original Port Royale.Īnd while I am at it then, while I know that Steam play time statistics can be seriously mis-leading because my own playtime of original PR and Pat 2/3 is in the more hundreds on disc and GOG versions, then I must confess that I find it almost laughable when another Steam user in another thread than this profess to like battle system in all three first Port Royale games since the user only got 32 hours of Steam play-time on Port Royale 3 on record where as I that only like the battle system in the original PR and Pat 2/3 still got 57 hours of playtime in PR3 on Steam - I mean I basically don't even like the game that much because I do not like the ships battle system and yet I have 57 hours of play time in it. So the introduction of the captains fencing in the Port Royale 2 were a mistake. Originally posted by Unerde:Let's first make Port Royale 4.Īs I have tried to explain more times to more people then Port Royale 2 is *NOT* the best because it breaks with the concept that Port Royale first and foremost is a game for people (core player group) that likes *leisure like' strategy element (and perhaps to some degree RPG ?) and not those that likes action games.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |